节点文献

儿童受虐量表、儿童被忽视量表的编制及信度效度研究

Child Abuse Scale and Child Neglect Scale: Development, Reliability and Validity

【作者】 杨世昌

【导师】 张亚林;

【作者基本信息】 中南大学 , 精神病与精神卫生学, 2006, 博士

【摘要】 第一部分:儿童受虐量表的编制及信度效度研究 目的:1.编制一套符合我国文化背景的儿童受虐量表。由儿童自评,对其受虐的程度给予定量、定性的评估,为研究儿童受虐提供一个可操作的量化工具。2.检验编制的儿童受虐量表的信度、效度。 方法:依据相关文献、既往量表中的相关条目进行修订编写,选用适合我国文化背景的语句表达方式,建立条目库。经相关专家对每个条目逐条打分评价,筛选出效价高的条目。在湘潭市某中学初中一、二年级学生及湘潭市某职业技术学院一年级新生中随机整群取样,共计902名,其中有效问卷871份,男性425名,平均年龄14.77±1.89岁,女性446名,平均年龄14.88±2.06岁。通过一般人口学资料问卷、儿童受虐量表、父母养育方式评价量表、艾森克人格问卷等进行横断面调查。2周后随机抽取87名(有效问卷),占样本的10%进行复测。采用儿童受虐可操作性理论框架结合探索性因素分析对儿童受虐量表进行初步的因素构建,再选用验证性因素分析证明因素结构的合理性。效度检验主要包括内容效度、结构效度和效标关联效度。选用Cronbach’s α系数、劈半相关和重测相关系数检验量表的信度。 结果: 1.通过项目分析、探索性因素分析及验证性因素分析最终形成由35条目构成儿童受虐量表。该量表由躯体虐待、言语虐待、性虐待3个分量表组成。 2.信度检验:总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.870,劈半信度系数为0.767,重测相关系数0.876。躯体虐待分量表Cronbach’s Alpha系数为0.862,劈半信度系数为0.853,重测相关系数0.881。言语虐待分量表Cronbach’s Alpha系数为0.748,劈半信度系数为0.696,重测相关系数0.811。性虐待分量表Cronbach’s Alpha系数为0.725,劈半信度系数为0.628,重测相关系数0.861。 3.效度检验:量表经该领域7位专家对条目内容进行评估,保留至少有5位专家评估达到所测目的的条目。探索性因素分析和验证

【Abstract】 PART Ⅰ Child Abuse Scale: Development, Reliability and ValidityObjective: To develop a new scale as an operable instrument for assessing the abused status of child. To examine the reliability and validity of the Child Abuse Scale (CAS).Methods: Considering the cultural background of China, an item pool was established through revising items in correlative literatures and scales. Then, the first draft of the CAS was developed by reserving effective items which was graded by interrelated experts. The sample consisted of 902 students of the junior high school and the technology and profession college. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to develop and evaluate the structure of the scale. The validity analyses included content validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity. The reliability analyses included Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability.Results: The CAS consisted of 35 items. The CAS was made of three sections which were physical abuse scale, verbal abuse scale and sexual abuse scale. The results of reliability were as follows: the cronbach’s Alpha reliability of the whole child abuse scale was 0.870, the split-half reliability was 0.767, and the test-retest reliability was 0.876. The cronbach’s Alpha reliability of the physical abuse scale was 0.862, the split-half reliability was 0.853, and the test-retest reliability was 0.881. The cronbach’s Alpha reliability of the verbal abuse scale was 0.748, the split-half reliability was 0.696, and the test-retest reliability was 0.811. The cronbach’s Alpha reliability of the sexual abuse scale was 0.725, the split-half reliability was 0.628, and the test-retest reliability was 0.861. The results of validity were as follows: the item loadings of the physical abuse scale ranged from 0.505 to 0.739, and the item loadings of the verbal abuse scale ranged from 0.402 to 0.715, and the item loadings of the sexual scale ranged from 0.332 to 0.811.The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the ratio of Chi-square to degrees of freedom was 3.814, the goodness of fit index was 0.904, the Tucker-Lewis index was 0.887, and the root mean square error of approximation was 0.041.

  • 【网络出版投稿人】 中南大学
  • 【网络出版年期】2007年 01期
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络