【作者】 宋明；

【导师】 马新福；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 法学理论， 2006， 博士

【摘要】 在由调解等非诉讼纠纷解决机制所构成的ADR大潮荡涤着世界主要法域纠纷解决格局的情势下,鉴于在中国社会的巨大变迁背景下我国人民调解机制运作中所面临的困境以及中国社会转型过程中出现的复杂而频发的纠纷,对人民调解进行理论研究具有非常重要的意义。本文试图通过对人民调解机制的法社会学研究,论证在中国不同社会发展时期人民调解纠纷解决机制存在、发展与转化的正当性,阐释人民调解是纠纷解决机制中“第三领域’’的定位并建构现代社会中人民调解的形态与功能,进而探寻和谐社会纠纷解决机制的科学配置与提高社会解决纠纷的整体质量。虽然法治是现代社会的基础,司法最终解决是法治社会纠纷解决的基本原则。但是司法并不是万能的,对于某些类型纠纷的解决,人民调解纠纷解决机制的效果更符合社会的需求。中国人民调解机制是纠纷解决机制配置中国家与社会共同参与的第三领域。现代人民调解机制应当逐步实现国家与社会纠纷解决权的良性互动。对人民调解进行现代建构应当既保留传统人民调解中有价值的因素又要使之与现代法治相兼容,尤其应当考虑中国法制现代化进程中城市与农村二元结构的特殊国情对纠纷解决机制的不同需求。更多还原

【Abstract】 The People’s Mediation is a non-litigating dispute resolution with Chinese culture and historical tradition. The dissertation aims to study the People’s Mediation based on sociology of law. In current China, the People’s Mediation is a hot issue, not only because it has been paid attention to by many scholars as a law tradition with long history, but also its validity as a dispute resolution has been testified in many western countries. The movement of ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) mainly composed of mediation is becoming popular in the modern western society. The People’s Mediation has been confronted with trouble and complex disputes have appeared on a large scale during the transformation of Chinese society. Therefore, it has important significance to study the People’s Mediation. Methods of sociology of law and economics of law, such as case analysis, data analysis, function analysis and benefit-cost analysis, are applied to study the People’s Mediation in the dissertation, which is both academic and practical.The core views are three. First, although rule of law is the base of modern society and final resolution by justice is principal for dispute settlement in the legal society, justice is not the only and the best means for resolving disputes. The effects of being resolved by the People’s Mediation更多还原