【作者】 李昕；

【导师】 夏新平；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 管理科学与工程， 2005， 博士

【摘要】 科技企业孵化器有利于促进高新技术成果转化与产业化,孵化高新技术企业,培养企业家和企业家精神。特别是对高等学校而言,发展高校科技企业孵化器有利于进一步发挥其服务社会职能。高校科技企业孵化器常常被混同于大学科技园或高新技术创业服务中心,我国目前仅有科技部制订的全国高新技术创业服务中心评价指标体系和教育部制订的国家大学科技园评估指标,对高校科技企业孵化器的评价研究还处于空白。本论文研究高校科技企业孵化器评价因素。在详细剖析我国高校科技企业孵化器的特点和发展现状之后,12 位具有代表性的专家根据Delphi 法的基本原理,讨论并评判了历史文献所列举的42 项评价因素,做了一些必要的补充,通过多次迭代统一意见,得到评价高校科技企业孵化器的23 项因素。按照组织理论的方法系统分析这些因素,可以建立一个高校科技企业孵化器孵化模型。依据这个孵化模型,按层次分析法可以综合得到原23 项评价因素的权重。继续绘出帕累托图,可以优化得到由15 项评价因素构成的高校科技企业孵化器孵化模型。进一步讨论得知,在缺乏大量样本实证的情况下,现阶段对高校科技企业孵化器的评价应以定性分析为主。此外,既然高校科技企业孵化器的发展还处于起步阶段,评价的根本目的在于促进其发展,现阶段对孵化器的评价就应该集中在孵育手段方面,从而通过改善行为(积极有效的孵育手段)来改善结果(较高的科技成果转化率和较高的企业成活率、成长率)。由理论上的分析和我国高校科技企业孵化器的实际运转情况,印证了这样的观点,即,对高校科技企业孵化器的评价,应该从培养创业精神、构建公共平台、建立信息网络等孵育手段发挥的效果来考察。针对我国高校科技成果转化的薄弱环节,本论文将高校科技企业孵化器与大更多还原

【Abstract】 Technology Business Incubators (TBIs) are benefit to facilitate technology transfer, nurture New Technology-based Firms (NTBFs), and cultivate entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship. Especially, developing University Technology Business Incubators (UTBIs) is relevant to help universities exert their social service function. UTBIs are usually confused with University Science Parks (USPs) or Hi-tech Innovation Service Centers (HISCs). At present, there’re only two sets of assessment indictors system, i.e. about National HISCs which is stipulated by the Ministry of Science and Technology, and about National USPs which is stipulated by the Ministry of Education. On the country, there is lack of assessment and research on UTBIs. This dissertation aims to research and ascertain the assessment factors of UTBIs. After detailed analysis on characteristics and developing level of our UTBIs, according to fundamental of Delphi Method, 12 representative experts discussed and justified 42 assessment factors which are aggregated and grouped from relevant literature, and made a necessary supplement. Embodied experts’opinions with the iteration method, the expected UTBIs’assessment model which is composed of 23 factors is presented. The aforesaid 23 factors are analyzed by using the Organization Theory, and then UTBIs’Incubation Model is built. By using the Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP), the 23 factors’weighing is obtained. After charted Pareto diagram, the final 15 factors of assessing UTBIs are picked out. Investigated further, due to lack of sufficient samples’data and comparable and verification analysis, qualitative analysis is the mainly assessment of UTBIs. Furthermore, since being at initial stage, the assessing purpose is to promote UTBIs’development, UTBIs should be assessed mainly on their incubation measures, so, ideal survival rate and growth rate may be obtained by means of UTBIs’effective incubation measures. Proved by theoretical analysis and our UTBIs’actual operation, UTBIs should be assessed on 3 incubation measures, i.e. cultivating entrepreneurship, establishing the shared platform, and building communication network. The issue is realistic significance, since this dissertation aims to highlight the weakness of our universities’technology transfer, distinguish UTBIs from USPs and HISCs, and research UTBIs’assessment factors. The method of choosing assessment factors is scientific and instructive, for applying Organization Theory and AHP to establish an UTBIs’Incubation Model, and to obtain the optimized assessing factors. The conclusion is demonstrative and oriented, because this article investigates the development of UTBIs, and emphasizes the need of assessing incubation measures and pushes benchmark management.更多还原