《二十四诗品》接受史

【作者】 李春桃；

【导师】 陈尚君；

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 ， 中国古代文学， 2005， 博士

【摘要】 题唐司空图的《二十四诗品》,是中国文学批评史上的经典著作。经典的作品是在读者的不断接受中成为经典的,《二十四诗品》显然是被不断经典化的著作,它的经典化的过程和原因,便是本论文要解决的问题。本论文主要从读者接受的角度,系统探讨了《二十四诗品》的接受史。全文共分七章: 第一章:梳理了与传世《二十四诗品》文字基本相同的《二十四品》的早期状况和流传途径、以及题司空图《诗品二十四则》的出现,并论述了郑鄤、费经虞对《二十四诗品》的初步认识。 第二章:清代王士禛对《二十四诗品》的阐释奠定了《二十四诗品》在中国诗学上的理论地位,康熙《御定全唐诗》对《诗品二十四则》的收录以及乾隆对《二十四诗品》的偏爱、袁枚《续诗品》等续作的纷呈,扩大了《二十四诗品》的影响。 第三章:探讨了清代翁方纲、沈德潜等基于个人的诗学主张对《二十四诗品》的解读,以及清代《二十四诗品》诸种注释本对《二十四诗品》体系上的认识。 第四章:通过对朱东润、李戏鱼等关于《二十四诗品》研究的考察,理清了《二十四诗品》在二十世纪五十年代前的概况。 第五章:考察了二十世纪八十年代后学人在《二十四诗品》的体系等方面进一步的研究,以及运用形式感、符号学等西方文艺理论解读《二十四诗品》的状况。 第六章:本章全面评述了近十年来学界关于《二十四诗品》真伪问题的争鸣,对于论辩双方都做了尽量客观的分析,并在此基础上提出了自己的看法。二十世纪九十年代中期,是《二十四诗品》研究的转折点。陈尚君、汪涌豪《司空图<二十四诗品>辨伪》主要从文献、语源与文艺观点等方面全面考察了《二十四诗品》的真相,提出《二十四诗品》伪书说,引起学界强烈反响。其后学人针对这个问题展开热烈讨论,把《二十四诗品》研究向前推进了一大步。 第七章:本章主要就《二十四诗品》海外的研究情况作了全面介绍,包括港台、韩国、日本、新加坡以及西方学界对于《二十四诗品》的研究。更多还原

【Abstract】 "The Twenty-four Modes of Poetry" which is regarded as Sikongtu’s is classical works and has been paid much attention to since Qing Dynasty and is regarded as a masterpiece linking together the venation of the development of ancient Chinese poetry study. It becomes classical through the reception of reader. The reason and process is subject of this paper. Based on their achievements, this disquisition discourses upon the process how receiptor of the book continuously developed and extended its merit. It is divided into seven parts:Part 1: Relying on the achievements along with the production of "the Pseudograph Discrimination", this part issues the nonage state and spreading ways of "the Twenty-four Modes", which resembles "the Twenty-four Modes of Poetry" in the content, analyses the creation of "The Twenty-four items of Modes of Poetry" and discusses Zheng Man and Fei Jingyu’s principal cognition about "the Twenty-four Modes of Poetry".Part 2: Wang Shizhen’s explanation laid a foundation for "the Twenty-four Modes of Poetry" on Chinese poetry study, while it consolidated the relationship between Sikong Tu and the book that it was embodied into "Imperially-authorized Complete poetry in Tang Dynasty" published during Kangxi Times and later beloved by Emperor Qianlong, and numbers of sequels such as "A Sequel to the Twenty-four Modes of Poetry" by Yuan Mei greatly expanded its reputation.Part 3: This part probes into Weng Fanggang and Shen Deqian’s understanding of "the Twenty-four Modes of Poetry" on behalf of their personal views on poetry study. The annotating edition of "the Twenty-four Modes of Poetry" in Qing Dynasty had great influence in unscrambling the communication between its scheme and the circulation of the universe.Part 4: Based on Zhu Dongrun and Li Xiyu’s research on the book, this part argues the state of its research before the 1950’s.Part 5: The research on "the Twenty-four Modes of Poetry" stepped up in studying its scheme and western literature theory was applied in the unscrambling of the book such as form sense and semeiology.Part 6: The milestone of its research is the presentation of the pseudograph theory by Chen Shangjun and Wang Yonghao in the midst of the 1990’s, which resounded in the academia. "The Pseudograph Discrimination" mainly argues in the aspects of philology, "twenty-four rhymes" and the etymology of the book, aimed at which, discussion was extended and the theory of the pseudograph was developed further.Part 7: This part introduce research on the Twenty-four Modes of Poetry abroad including Hongkong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Singapore and west countries.更多还原