【作者】 康明；

【导师】 沈四宝；

【作者基本信息】 对外经济贸易大学 ， 国际法学， 2004， 博士

【摘要】 在我国，商事仲裁长期以来被作为一种准司法活动看待，其设立与发展均带有浓厚的行政色彩并受到诸多限制。其实，商事仲裁是商事主体自主采取的解决自身争议的方式，是一种商事救济行为，其本质属性是专业化的服务，属于市场经济中的法律服务范畴和一个专门行业。 仲裁员／仲裁机构与争议当事人形成提供与接受商事仲裁专业服务的关系，在法律层面上通过商事仲裁服务合同体现出来。商事仲裁服务合同与一般合同相比，其主体、合同成立、内容等均有其特殊性。它以争议当事人之间的仲裁协议为基础，但不等同于仲裁协议本身。 商事仲裁服务应尊重争议当事人的意思自治，遵循市场经济的客观规律，故我国《仲裁法》有必要以此为原则加以完善：放弃行政直接管理和干预；取消对争议当事人选择服务提供者的限制，确立临时仲裁制度；仲裁机构的设置和运作依照市场需求和规则；机构仲裁中由仲裁庭自行决定管辖权；取消强制性仲裁员名册制，实行推荐性名册制；将仲裁费划分为仲裁机构管理费和仲裁员报酬两部分并在仲裁规则中予以明确；建立商事仲裁服务责任赔偿制度。 商事仲裁属于WTO中的服务贸易范畴。随着社会主义市场经济体制的完善，我国商事仲裁也面临着对外开放和参与国际竞争的问题。更多还原

【Abstract】 In China, commercial arbitration has long been regarded as one kind of quasi-judicial activity, with its establishment and development having a strong administrative character and being restricted in many ways. As a matter of fact, commercial arbitration is a remedy for business dealings and a means of dispute resolution whereby the parties resolve their disputes with their own efforts. In essence, commercial arbitration is a special professional service and falls within the category and sector of legal service in a market economy.The author holds that the relationship between arbitrators/arbitration institutions and disputing parties is that of service provider and service receiver, the service being commercial arbitration. From a legal viewpoint, there exists a commercial arbitration service contract in this relationship, which differs in the parties, formation and contents, as compared with other contracts. The commercial arbitration service contract is based on the arbitration agreement between the disputing parties, but it is different from the arbitration agreement itself.The author is of the view that commercial arbitration service should respect the autonomy of the disputing parties and follow the law ofthe market economy. Based thereon, Chinese Arbitration Law should amended and perfected in the following respects:1. Any direct management by administrative agencies or any administrative interference should be abolished;2. Any restriction on the disputing parties’ free choice of the service provider should be eradicated and ad hoc arbitration be recognized;3. The organization of arbitration institutions and their operations should meet the needs and rules of the market economy;4. In institutional arbitration, the arbitration tribunal should be vested with the power to rule on its own jurisdiction;5. The mandatory panel of arbitrators should be replaced with a recommended one;6. The arbitration fee should be divided into administrative fee of the arbitration institution and arbitrators’ remuneration and this should be made clear in the arbitration rules;7. A liability or compensation system should be established for commercial arbitration service.The author also holds that commercial arbitration is governed as a service trade under the WTO. With the improvement of Chinese socialist market economy, its arbitration will face the question of opening up to overseas competition.更多还原