【作者】 程勇；

【导师】 蒋凡；

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 ， 中国古代文学， 2003， 博士

【摘要】 论文以马克思主义意识形态理论为依据，讨论汉代经学视野中的儒家文论叙述问题。论文认为，从先秦到两汉，儒学经历了意识形态化的过程，儒家文论叙述因此发生了意义重大的一次转型，这主要表现为从维护意识形态立场出发对文（学）做出种种规定，但也同时携带着知识分子的文化理想。两汉儒学的主体是经学，汉儒文论叙述便是在经典释义的过程中引领出来的关于文（学）的看法和主张。今文经学、古文经学、谶纬学是经学中的三种儒学类型，其间有斗争，有融合。以争夺国家文教制度的解释权为轴心，分属不同学派的经学家以不同的话语方式，表达了总体一致的文论主张和看法，而此话语方式又受制于意识形态以及学派之间的斗争。更多还原

【Abstract】 Based on the ideology theory of Marxism, this paper discuss the narration about Confucian Wen-theory under the visual angle of the study of Confucian classics in Han Dynasty. The paper reason that from Pre-Qin Period to Han Dynasty, Confucian School came through a so-called ideologized course, and the narration about Confucian Wen-theory arose a type-conversion with significant meanings consequently, which manifested various prescriptions on Wen (literature) from the ideology standpoint. But from other hand, those prescriptions also implied cultural ideals from highbrow standpoint.In Han Dynasty, the principal part of Confucian School is the study of Confucian classics, so the narration about Confucian Wen-theory was some attitudes, opinions and affirmations on Wen (literature), which being arisen in the interpretation course on those Classical books. The ancient writing classic study, up-to-date writing classic study and Tsan-wei are three types of Confucian School in the study of Confucian classics, there are struggles and amalgamations between them. Surrounded the contest axes of the interpretation power on the system of national politics and culture and education, those intellectuals which belonged to different schools expressed some opinions and attitudes on Wen (literature) as a whole by different discourse patterns, and those patterns are enslaved to the imperial ideology and the struggle between different schools.更多还原